Post by account_disabled on Dec 19, 2023 23:53:43 GMT -6
Working hours, so that employees do not work more than six consecutive days. The appellant filed an action against Varzim Sol in which he essentially sought to establish the fact that the latter did not grant him the mandatory rest days to which he considered he was entitled, in accordance with Portuguese legislation and collective agreements. In this regard, he requested allowances and compensations corresponding to the remuneration due for overtime hours worked, for the seven consecutive days in which he had to work and for the fact that he was deprived of the second day of weekly rest, as well as for the days of compensatory rest which were not granted to him. Preliminary questions " ) In the light of Article [of Directive / and.
Directive / respectively] and Article of the [Charter], where shift workers country email list who benefit from rest periods by rotation, employed in an establishment which is open daily but which does not have continuous -hour productive periods, the mandatory day of rest to which the worker is entitled within a seven-day period must be granted, namely the late on the seventh day after six consecutive working days? ) The interpretation that, in relation to these workers, the employer can choose the days on which he gives them, weekly, the rest to which they are entitled, so that he can compel them to work up to consecutive days without paying them overtime ( in particular between Wednesday of the week, preceded by rest on Monday and Tuesday, until Friday of the following week, followed by rest on.
Saturday and Sunday), is it or is it not in compliance with the said directives and provisions? ) The interpretation that the -hour uninterrupted rest period can be granted on any of the calendar days in a given seven-calendar-day period and that the next -hour uninterrupted rest period (to which the hours are added of daily rest) may also be granted on any of the calendar days in the period of seven calendar days following the said period is it or is it not in accordance with the said directives and provisions? ) The interpretation that the worker may benefit, instead of one uninterrupted rest period of hours (to which the hours of daily rest is added) for each seven-day period, of two uninterrupted rest periods of hours, consecutive or non-consecutive, in any of the calendar days of a certain reference period of calendar.
Directive / respectively] and Article of the [Charter], where shift workers country email list who benefit from rest periods by rotation, employed in an establishment which is open daily but which does not have continuous -hour productive periods, the mandatory day of rest to which the worker is entitled within a seven-day period must be granted, namely the late on the seventh day after six consecutive working days? ) The interpretation that, in relation to these workers, the employer can choose the days on which he gives them, weekly, the rest to which they are entitled, so that he can compel them to work up to consecutive days without paying them overtime ( in particular between Wednesday of the week, preceded by rest on Monday and Tuesday, until Friday of the following week, followed by rest on.
Saturday and Sunday), is it or is it not in compliance with the said directives and provisions? ) The interpretation that the -hour uninterrupted rest period can be granted on any of the calendar days in a given seven-calendar-day period and that the next -hour uninterrupted rest period (to which the hours are added of daily rest) may also be granted on any of the calendar days in the period of seven calendar days following the said period is it or is it not in accordance with the said directives and provisions? ) The interpretation that the worker may benefit, instead of one uninterrupted rest period of hours (to which the hours of daily rest is added) for each seven-day period, of two uninterrupted rest periods of hours, consecutive or non-consecutive, in any of the calendar days of a certain reference period of calendar.